Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!unmvax.cs.unm.edu!collins
From: collins@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Bill Collins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Ultrix licence (was: DEC station 3100)
Keywords: DEC licence
Message-ID: <24@unmvax.unm.edu>
Date: 31 Mar 89 03:03:05 GMT
References: <272@cbnewsl.ATT.COM> <7561@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <3085@stpstn.UUCP>
Sender: news@unmvax.unm.edu
Reply-To: collins@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Bill Collins)
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of New Mexico at Albuquerque
Lines: 16

In article <3085@stpstn.UUCP> aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri) writes:
>In article <7561@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> thompson@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (Steve Thompson) writes:
>>have multiple users logged in. However, the machine comes with a 2 user
>>license
End user licence, right?
>
>This is one of the things that I *can't* forgive DEC for.

Don't you mean AT&T?  It's their unix, DEC licences through AT&T.  Doesn't
AT&T get the royalties?  Also, there are several ways one may licence unix.
(enduser, source, etc.)  To which licence are you comparing this to?

Bill
			Bill Collins
			collins@unmvax.unm.edu
			ucbvax!unmvax!collins