Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!oregon!goes
From: goes@oregon.uoregon.edu (Jim Goes, Univ of Oregon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: telix and com3
Message-ID: <341@oregon.uoregon.edu>
Date: 25 Mar 89 10:28:02 GMT
References: <94545@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Oregon
Lines: 16

In article <94545@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>, kirk%enterprise@Sun.COM ('Captain' Kirk DeHaan) writes:
> 2.  Can Telix (3.11) be made to work with com3?  The docs say yes but
> trying to do so results in a hung system.  Looking at the telix.cnf file
-- 
I've had the same problem with Telix.  I can get Procomm Plus to recognize the
COM3 port but not Telix, even though I use the same IRQ and interrupt settings
for both.  I referred this problem to Colin (author of Telix) and he said COM3
should work as long as there are no conflicts (i.e. a mouse running on COM1 or
something).  Even with nothing on COM1 I can't get Telix to work on COM3.  I
finally gave up, and have been using Telix on COM1 exclusively.
_______________________________________________________________________________ 
Jim Goes                      |  InterNet   GOES@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU 
Graduate School of Management |  UUCP:      {fav backbone}!uoregon!oregon!goes
University of Oregon          |  MaBell:    (503) 686-3309
________________________________________________________________________________
Grad School. Its not just a job, it's an indenture...