Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!Portia!ameet
From: ameet@Portia.Stanford.EDU (Ameet Bhansali)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Laserwriter sales to students
Message-ID: <1057@Portia.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 22 Mar 89 04:40:45 GMT
References: <9028@netnews.upenn.edu> <1052@Portia.Stanford.EDU> <27679@apple.Apple.COM>
Sender: Ameet Bhansali <ameet@Portia.stanford.edu>
Reply-To: ameet@Portia.UUCP (Ameet Bhansali)
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 16



In article <27679@apple.Apple.COM> mjohnson@Apple.COM (Mark B. Johnson) writes:

>This isn't an official Apple viewpoint, but when I was at Notre Dame I
>understood that the reason students could no longer purchase LaserWriters
>after the first year or so when they were available is that too many
>students were buying them for their parents and their businesses...not exactly
>proper use of the consortium pricing and something which really upsets
>local dealers...

What is to prevent students from buying costlier Mac II (x)(cx)s for
"their parents and their businesses?"

Ameet Bhansali
(ameet@portia.stanford.edu)