Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!ruddles.sprl.umich.edu!jfm From: jfm@ruddles.sprl.umich.edu.engin.umich.edu (John F. Mansfield) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Hard drives and airport x-rays, bad?? Message-ID: <42378609.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu> Date: 24 Mar 89 15:50:00 GMT References: <88494@felix.UUCP> Sender: netnews@caen.engin.umich.edu Reply-To: jfm@ruddles.sprl.umich.edu.UUCP (John F. Mansfield) Organization: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Lines: 39 In article <88494@felix.UUCP> kehr@felix.UUCP (Shirley Kehr) writes: >In article carter@PORTIA.STANFORD.EDU ("Thomas J. Carter") writes: > I would have thought that the only danger to a hard disk when passed through an X-ray machine would be the close proximity of large motors running the conveyor belt. The X-radiation is not going to locally generate a high enough magnetic field to change information on the disk and the energy of the X-rays is not sufficient to cause detrimental ionizing effects in the disk medium. If there were sufficient energy, then all of the users of the equipment and the passengers would be getting doses of secondary radiation. I have passed hard disks through these machines without even thinking and also floppies (they are after all not really different) and have not had a problem. High speed film IS a problem, but magnetic media, I think not. However, I dont want a boatload of flames because people have taken their disks on a flight and then plugged them in at the end of their trip to find a "this disk is damaged" or "this disk is unreadable" dialog. If that happens, it is more liekly that the disk has been damaged by a physical shock than by X-rays. Who knows how firmly those heads are parked!! John Mansfield North Campus Electron Microbeam Analysis Laboratory 2455 Hayward, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2143. 313-936-3352 Internet: jfm@ruddles.sprl.umich.edu or john_mansfield.um.cc.umich.edu