Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!pdn!rnms1!alan From: alan@rnms1.paradyne.com (0000-Alan Lovejoy(0000)) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Yet Another Baseless Rumor Message-ID: <5884@pdn.paradyne.com> Date: 31 Mar 89 02:40:27 GMT References: <2464@tank.uchicago.edu> <1377@taux01.UUCP> <4252fa64.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu> Sender: news@pdn.paradyne.com Reply-To: alan@rnms1.paradyne.com (0000-Alan Lovejoy) Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida Lines: 55 In article <4252fa64.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu> billkatt@caen.engin.umich.edu (billkatt) writes: >In article <1377@taux01.UUCP> cyosta%taux01@nsc.COM ( Yossie Silverman ) writes: >>I heard from a friend who knows people that the Mac IIxE is to be introduced >>later this year. It will feature a 33Mhz 68030, all the goodies in the >>current new macs AND a RISC (88000 I would assume) QuickDraw processor. >>I think this machine would count as a NeXT killer as it will have the >>fastest (or at least very fast) graphics around. > >The Quickdraw processor is an AMD 27000, not an 88000, an 88000 costs MUCH >too much to use as a co-processor. What is an AMD 27000? Do you mean an AMD 29000 RISC? You're quite right that the 88k is too expensive. Given the price which Apple pays for 68030's, a dual 68030 design is far more likely. Or perhaps even a 68030/68020 combo. After all, the graphics coprocessor doesn't strictly need memory mangement. Another possibility, for this time next year, is a 68040 based Mac. For those of you who have not heard, Motorola "announced" the 68040 this week. Details: General Sampling date: September 1989 Volume production date: 1Q90 Clock Speed: 25MHz initially, with 33MHz 3-4 months behind. Performance: 13.5 @ 25MHz (Intel claims 10 MIPS @ 25 MHz for the 80486) 2 MFLOPS SP (about 8x the 68882) Transistor count: 1.2 million Process: 1 micron HCMOS On-Chip Caches: 4k instruction, 4k data Functional Units: integer, floating point, mmu Compatibility: full upward compatibility with 68030/68882 Price: unspecified Other comments: full internal Harvard architecture; Motorola has not yet released all pertitent information, including what programmer-visible architectural extensions there may be or whether the '040 uses microcode or not; based on the MIPS rating and the clock speed, it appears that the '040's cycles-per-instruction ratio is just under 2, at least when executing 68030-compatible code; that means that it is about equivalent to the current-generation Fujitsu SPARC chip at the same clock speed; people who might reasonably know have claimed that it also has RISC style 3-operand register-register instructions, which significantly increase performance if used; we'll see. [Source for most of this: Electronic Engineering Times, March 27 '89] Alan Lovejoy; alan@pdn; 813-530-2211; AT&T Paradyne: 8550 Ulmerton, Largo, FL. Disclaimer: I do not speak for AT&T Paradyne. They do not speak for me. __American Investment Deficiency Syndrome => No resistance to foreign invasion. Motto: If nanomachines will be able to reconstruct you, YOU AREN'T DEAD YET.