Xref: utzoo comp.sys.pyramid:353 comp.sys.sequent:197 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!amdahl!pacbell!sactoh0!caanders From: caanders@sactoh0.UUCP (Chris A. Anderson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.pyramid,comp.sys.sequent Subject: Questions about Pyramid/Sequent Keywords: pyramid sequent Message-ID: <764@sactoh0.UUCP> Date: 22 Mar 89 01:31:31 GMT Distribution: na Organization: Sacramento Public Access, Ca. USA Lines: 44 We're a commercial health care claims management shop for large hospitals and clinics. We're currently looking at several possible hardware choices for replacing our aging Plexus (Sys V.2) computers. Two of the bids we have received are: Pyramid 9815 -or- Sequent S81 (4 processors) Both are configured with 32 Mb main memory, 8 Gb disk storage (yes, that's 8 Gigabytes), with terminal servers hooked via ethernet to the machine. We are committed for the nonce to System V. We plan on having 80-100 users, mostly running in-house database applications (file inquiry/update type stuff). Of those, approx. 20 are development people. The questions we have are: 1. Will having 80-100 users concurrently on the Pyramid degrade terminal response time signif- icantly? We have been told that the 9815 doesn't have the horsepower to service this number of users on ethernet. 2. Several people have said that the Sequent will not handle 8 Gb of storage with anything less than 8 CPU's installed. Is there any truth to this? Why? These questions are sparked by statements by the different vendors in question, and by responses to previous postings I've made to the net asking for information on the two machines. Anybody have any experiences that they care to share? By E-mail, please. If there's any interest, I'll post (or e-mail) a summary. Thanks in advance!!! Chris -- | Chris Anderson email : pacbell!sactoh0!utgard!chris | | QMA, Inc. or : ...!{csuchico,csusac}!fenris | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | Of *course* I speak for my employer, would he have it any other way? |