Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!voder!pyramid!nsc!icldata!altnet!altos86!dtynan
From: knudsen@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Knudsen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix
Subject: Re: CIP (was Re: CGM<->PIC Translator)
Summary: XCIP is newer
Keywords: CIP
Message-ID: <930@altos86.UUCP>
Date: 30 Mar 89 02:40:28 GMT
Sender: dtynan@altos86.UUCP
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois
Lines: 10
Approved: dtynan@zorba.Tynan.COM

In article <284@sortac.UUCP>, pls@sortac.UUCP (Pat Sullivan) writes:
> How / where can I find out more about CIP?
> It sounds like it might make something we're doing easier.

I use XCIP on my 630 (eXperimental CIP), which is presumably newer
and more powerful.  It's crashed on me only once; besides that
it's pretty smooth.  It should come with DMD Exptools.

Perhaps someone else can comment on XCIP's improvements
(or just differences) relative to CIP.