Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:12472 comp.society.futures:1115
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.ge.com (Wm. E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.society.futures
Subject: Re: Future at Berzerkeley
Keywords: Leading Edge == Bottom Line
Message-ID: <13452@steinmetz.ge.com>
Date: 27 Mar 89 19:06:43 GMT
References: <4572@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 13

In article <4572@pt.cs.cmu.edu> jps@cat.cmu.edu (James Salsman) writes:

| BSD code is more accessable; if AT&T wants major innovations
| under SysV, they are going to have to be more easy-going 
| with the sources and software hooks.

  Really? I thought you had to buy a SysV source license before you
could get BSD source. Has that changed? Of course there are more
*unlicensed* copies of BSD around, that I agree.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@crd.GE.COM)
  {uunet | philabs}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me