Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!purdue!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Future at Berzerkeley
Message-ID: <9946@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 29 Mar 89 17:07:04 GMT
References: <4572@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <3095@stpstn.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <3095@stpstn.UUCP> aad@stepstsone.com writes:
-In article <4572@pt.cs.cmu.edu> jps@cat.cmu.edu (James Salsman) writes:
->a long time, but SysV will always be more stable.
-Let's see:  svr1,svr2,svr3,svr3.2,svr4...  Seems like they come out with
-versions a lot more often.

He said "stable", not "stagnant".