Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!tektronix!reed!wab
From: wab@reed.UUCP (Bill Baker)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Tcsh? Ksh? anything?
Message-ID: <12189@reed.UUCP>
Date: 26 Mar 89 23:32:58 GMT
References: <598@marob.MASA.COM>
Reply-To: wab@reed.UUCP (Bill Baker)
Organization: Reed College, Portland OR
Lines: 22

In article <598@marob.MASA.COM> daveh@marob.masa.com (Dave Hammond) writes:
>In article <589@marob.MASA.COM> I wrote:
>>>Aspen Software markets Ksh for Xenix, as does (I believe) MKS.
>
>In article <12134@reed.UUCP> wab@reed.UUCP (Bill Baker) writes:
>>Wait a minute.  As of fall '87 SCO was distributing a ksh floppy (undocumented
>>and unsupported) to interested customers.  Is this no longer the case?
>
>If that were the case, I think many more of us would have known about it
>and it would have been in wide circulation at this point ...

You're probably right and it probably isn't SCO's policy anymore, but it was at
one time because I myself checked such a floppy out of SCO's product
engineering cabinet.  Easy to check, though, since the SCO Hotline
folks read this newsgroup.  Ross, is this no longer the case?

------------
Bill Baker 
{backbone}!tektronix!reed!wab

"When developing a software clone, an SCO employee and his conscience
are soon parted."  --From the Great Book of SCO Koans.