Xref: utzoo news.groups:8304 comp.windows.x:8881
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!oliveb!sun!kimba!hvr
From: hvr%kimba@Sun.COM (Heather Rose)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION -- splitting comp.windows.x (was: Is it time for Comp.windows.x.bugs?) (LONG)
Message-ID: <95503@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 23 Mar 89 09:48:02 GMT
References: <14051@bellcore.bellcore.com> <829@hydra.cs.Helsinki.FI> <14717@bellcore.bellcore.com> <564@peritek.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: hvr@sun.UUCP (Heather Rose)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 10

In article <564@peritek.UUCP> dig@peritek.UUCP (Dave Gotwisner) writes:
>
>    I agree, comp.windows.x should split it up.  I am cross posting this
>to comp.windows.x to include the entire group since c.w.x readers are the
>ones this most affects (as opposed to news.groups).  I personally don't think
>the break should be on bugs/not bugs, but on client/server.

sounds good to me.

Heather