Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!decvax!zinn!ditka!kls From: kls@ditka.UUCP (Karl Swartz) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Puting routes for other systems' connections in your map Summary: I agree, given two special cases Message-ID: <976@ditka.UUCP> Date: 22 Mar 89 07:11:27 GMT References: <270@verdix.verdix.com> Reply-To: kls@ditka.UUCP (Karl Swartz) Organization: Inaction Central, Los Alamos, New Mexico Lines: 48 In article <270@verdix.verdix.com> nomad@verdix.com (Lee Damon) writes: >In looking through the maps I notice that a lot of people are posting >things like: > >#N foo >[deleted] >bar bloviy(DEDICATED), blivit(EVENING) > >Now, I realize that things are supposed to look like this, but in foo's >map? This means that foo is advertising a link between bar and ... >What do you think? With two exceptions, I think this practice is wrong. First special case is if foo and bar are at the same site and under common admin- istration. Perhaps the #N line should reflect this by listing both machines, e.g. "#N foo, bar". The other case is for a new link when the postmaster at the other site is a bit slow about updating his/her map entry. For example, I set up a link with sleepy, and notice several months later that sleepy's map entry hasn't been updated yet. I feel justified in adding sleepy ditka(DEMAND) to ditka's map entry, assuming we agreed to a DEMAND link in that direction. As soon as I noticed that sleepy's entry has been updated, I'd delete the line from ditka's entry. >Should this kind of thing be allowed? Except for the two cases I mention above, no. >Should the mapping project paople (or what's left of 'em) delete >this from submitted maps (or just bounce them back)? It seems appropriate that they take some action. >nomad (the nasty nit-picker) Good to see I'm not alone. :-) -- Karl Swartz |UUCP {ames!hc!rt1,decuac!netsys}!ditka!kls 1-505/667-7777 (work) |ARPA rt1!ditka!kls@hc.dspo.gov 1-505/672-3113 (home) |BIX kswartz "I never let my schooling get in the way of my education." (Twain)