Xref: utzoo news.groups:8534 news.admin:5310
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!sulaco!allen
From: allen@sulaco.Sigma.COM (Allen Gwinn)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Counting the Votes
Summary: I like your logic, Pete
Message-ID: <589@sulaco.Sigma.COM>
Date: 28 Mar 89 13:13:43 GMT
References: <1634@ncar.ucar.edu> <11326@s.ms.uky.edu> <3549@ficc.uu.net> <27812@apple.Apple.COM> <3566@ficc.uu.net>
Reply-To: allen@sulaco.sigma.com (Allen Gwinn)
Organization: Classified
Lines: 12

In article <3566@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:

>If someone can summon up 100 people to vote against a group, there is enough
>anti-interest to consider it a bad idea. ANY group that has any great amount
>of controversy is probably going to ba a bad net.partner anyway.

So, if I put out a vote to rmgroup a group, and got 100 for and 100 
against, what should be done?  What about 100 for removal and 150 for
the retention?  Should the minority rule in this case?

-- 
Allen Gwinn  sulaco!allen      DISCLAIMER: Nobody else would WANT my opinions.