Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Scrap the current NG creation procedure, invent a new one
Message-ID: <3587@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 28 Mar 89 20:22:14 GMT
References: <3010@looking.UUCP>
Organization: Xenix Support
Lines: 24

Brad is being a loose cannon again:

In article <3010@looking.UUCP>, brad@looking.UUCP (Brad Templeton) writes:
> The current procedure isn't working at all, in my opinion.  What good
> does it do to refine it and add more bureaucracy?

The current procedure works just fine, if you bother to follow it.

The objections raised by this article are, by and large, without foundation.
The amount of argument about technicalities is minimal. The majority of calls
for votes are due to people not reading the rules. Nitpicking will always be
with us. 

If it takes 6 or 8 weeks, what of it? 

> Replace it with what?  The next posting says.  If you have a real
> replacement, let's hear yours, too.

alt.dev.null?
-- 
Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.

Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180.
Personal: ...!texbell!sugar!peter, peter@sugar.hackercorp.com.