Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!cbnews!howard@cos.com From: howard@cos.com (Howard C. Berkowitz) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Largest Bomb dropped Summary: fuel-air explosive Message-ID: <5169@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 28 Mar 89 03:43:15 GMT References: <4876@cbnews.ATT.COM> <5032@cbnews.ATT.COM> <5144@cbnews.ATT.COM> Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM Organization: Corporation for Open Systems, McLean, VA Lines: 56 Approved: military@att.att.com From: howard@cos.com (Howard C. Berkowitz) In article <5144@cbnews.ATT.COM>, ssc-vax!shuksan!major@beaver.cs.washington.edu (Mike Schmitt) writes: > > > From: ssc-vax!shuksan!major@beaver.cs.washington.edu (Mike Schmitt) > > > > > I've read stories about a ten ton (??) bomb being used in Vietnam. > > Are these the 'daisy cutters' that made the LZs? They weren't THAT > good. It left 3-4 foot high tree stumps all over the LZ - which meant > the assault helos had to hover over them while the troops exited. > Carrying a 50lb rucksack - that hurts! > > > The C-130 bomb weighed 15,000 lbs. It was a gas bomb ie it allowed propane, > I think the bombs we are discussing are fuel-air explosives, sometimes implemented as a single canister and more often as cluster munitions. They use ethylene oxide, not propane; their delivery height and such is relatively critical, because the gas cloud must form and have the proper fuel-air ratio before a separate igniter actuates -- these do not have a single burster charge! If anyone has the Fort Bragg Student Text on special forces techniques, it will show a field expedient version of a fuel-air explosive, involving a small burster charge scattering gasoline, _flour_, etc., and then firing a secondary incendiary charge to ignite the fuel. In _Red October_. Tom Clancy uses fuel-air explosives to get extremely high explosive yield within a (no spoilers) relatively confined space. He called the weapons Pave Pat Blue, which may be correct; memory does not serve. I consider his example highly unlikely, since it would be quite difficult to get the necessary air-gas ratio in a constricted area with obstructions -- these bombs are meant to form an airburst! > > I 'heard' (ie totally unsubstantiated) that this 'propane' bomb created > a very distinct 'mushroom shape' cloud - and that the Air Force was > told not to use it anymore in Vietnam - for obvious reasons. > (can anyone clarify this?) Virtually any large explosion creates a mushroom cloud -- see pictures of ammunition ship explosions such as Texas City and Halifax. -- howard@cos.com OR {uunet, decuac, sun!sundc, hadron, hqda-ai}!cos!howard (703) 883-2812 [W] (703) 998-5017 [H] DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Corporation for Open Systems, its members, or any standards body.