Path: utzoo!telly!ziebmef!berner!ziebmef!ncrcan!lsuc!sickkids!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!utgpu!watmath!onfcanim!dave
From: dave@onfcanim.UUCP (Dave Martindale)
Newsgroups: can.general
Subject: Re: income tax: what's this nonsense?
Message-ID: <17851@onfcanim.UUCP>
Date: 29 Mar 89 01:57:13 GMT
References: <1989Mar22.092633.26205@lsuc.uucp> <582@sce.carleton.ca>
Reply-To: dave@onfcanim.UUCP (Dave Martindale)
Distribution: can
Organization: National Film Board / Office national du film, Montreal
Lines: 12

In article <582@sce.carleton.ca> greg@sce.UUCP (Greg Franks) writes:
>It's going to
>compute how much they owe me, so why do I have to go through the
>nonsense of computing 17% of this and 26% of that, fold mutliate and
>spindle.  [ ... ]
>So, why should I go throug the aggravation of filling
>in the bottom line when they're going to ignore it?

Note that this only applies to people who expect refunds.  For those of
us who owe the receiver general even more money, Revenue Canada is not
going to be happy if you miscalculate and underpay them.  And who wants
to overpay?