Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!oliveb!sun!fatcity!khb
From: khb@fatcity.Sun.COM (Keith Bierman Sun Tactical Engineering)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: yes vs. no on f8x
Keywords: f8x, x3j3, wg5, ansi
Message-ID: <98678@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 12 Apr 89 18:55:13 GMT
References: <24130@beta.lanl.gov>
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: khb@sun.UUCP (Keith Bierman Sun Tactical Engineering)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 24

In article <24130@beta.lanl.gov> dd@beta.lanl.gov (Dan Davison) writes:

>(*) but if that opinion disagrees with him, I get the impression that
>it would still be "uninformed".  At least that's the way his
>postings read to me...

Au contrai (sp). Alex Marzuk and Igor Phillips are both anit-draft and
very well informed. I appreciate their positions, and respect their
depth of understanding.

Nor should it be infered that they are the only folks who are
informed and still against the proposed standard. What is irksome is
that I still find people who completely in the dark, but firmly
against the proposal. 

If I have given the impression that all who are against me are
misinformed neo-luddites, I apologise to those of you who are neither.

cheers



Keith H. Bierman
It's Not My Fault ---- I Voted for Bill & Opus