Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!ur-valhalla!davis
From: davis@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu (Al Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: C to Fortran conversion (was: fortran to c conversion)
Message-ID: <2099@valhalla.ee.rochester.edu>
Date: 13 Apr 89 18:25:09 GMT
References: <1860@wpi.wpi.edu> <11924@lanl.gov>
Sender: usenet@valhalla.ee.rochester.edu
Reply-To: davis@ee.rochester.edu (Al Davis)
Organization: UR Dept. of Electrical Engg, Rochester NY 14627
Lines: 7


In article <11924@lanl.gov> jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) writes:
>Of course, Fortran would be better than C if it had dynamic memory and
>recursion (like 8x does 8-).  But, for thing that don't need these features,
>Fortran is already better than C.      ^^^^^^

This is not a typo.  (I couldn't resist...)