Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!mailrus!b-tech!zeeff
From: zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Elm Monthly Posting - Elm 2.2 Released
Message-ID: <9216@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>
Date: 12 Apr 89 13:48:04 GMT
References: <105@dsinc.UUCP>
Reply-To: zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff)
Organization: Branch Technology Ann Arbor, MI
Lines: 26

In article <105@dsinc.UUCP> syd@dsinc.UUCP (Syd Weinstein) writes:

>Known bugs in Elm 2.2 PL0:

>4. Does it obey existing mail standards?
>
>	Yes!  That's another of the basic reasons the program was 
>originally written!  To ensure that the date field, the "From:" line
>and so on were all added in the correct format.  The program is 100%
>correct according to the RFC-822 electronic mail header protocol
>guide.

Actually no.  Elm currently has problems replying to some rfc822 legal
addresses (like the examples in rfc822).  This should have been added to
the bug list.








-- 
  Jon Zeeff			zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us
  Ann Arbor, MI			mailrus!b-tech!zeeff