Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ucsbcsl!nessus!ivucsb!ivaux!steve
From: steve@ivaux.UUCP (Steve Lemke)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Call for discussion, comp.mail.mush
Message-ID: <292@ivaux.UUCP>
Date: 5 Apr 89 21:52:12 GMT
References: <254@cbnewsm.ATT.COM> <22789@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <1642@fig.bbn.com> <137@inf.ethz.ch>
Reply-To: steve@ivaux.UUCP (Steve Lemke)
Organization: Computer Products Design, Santa Barbara, CA
Lines: 14

In article <137@inf.ethz.ch> wyle@inf.ethz.ch (Mitchell Wyle) writes:
}
}Very few messages contrast elm or mailx to mush; very many are mush-specific.

Well, how about a message from someone contrasting mush and elm?  I am
familiar with elm, and currently run mailx on my Mac II (A/UX).  Should I
get the new version of elm or should I locate mush (and where does one find
mush?)  How about a brief summary of features/differences?

-- 
----- Steve Lemke ------------------- "MS-DOS (OS/2, etc.) - just say no!"
----- Internet: lemke@apple.ucsb.edu                 AppleLink:  Lemke    
----- Or try:   pyramid!nessus!ivucsb!ivaux!steve    CompuServe: 73627,570
----- Quote:    "What'd I go to college for?"   "You had fun, didn't you?"