Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!ukma!rutgers!apple!bbn!bbn.com!clements
From: clements@bbn.com (Bob Clements)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: MS-DOS TCP/IP
Message-ID: <38352@bbn.COM>
Date: 6 Apr 89 16:53:44 GMT
References: <MS-C.607804220.377401575.mrc@SUMEX-AIM.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@bbn.COM
Reply-To: clements@BBN.COM (Bob Clements)
Lines: 18

In article <MS-C.607804220.377401575.mrc@SUMEX-AIM.Stanford.EDU>
mrc@SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU (Mark Crispin) writes:

>     I've heard n different stories about which TCP is "best".  Here are my
>preferences, and I'd appreciate some guidelines:
> . public domain w/ sources.  
 ...
>     The leading condenders seem to be KA9Q and NCSA.
 ...
>-- Mark --

At the risk of being tediously pedantic and repetitive, the KA9Q
package is NOT public domain.  It's copyrighted but freely
copyable for non-commercial use.  (Phil has made arrangements for
commercial use in some cases, which I point out because I'm sure
he wouldn't use the net himself to advertise.)

/Rcc