Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!rpi!pawl20.pawl.rpi.edu!entropy
From: entropy@pawl.rpi.edu (Math Student from Hell)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.eniac
Subject: Re: Well, now...
Message-ID: <1069@rpi.edu>
Date: 2 Apr 89 05:43:13 GMT
References: <DEVEN.89Apr1184706@daniel.pawl.rpi.edu>
Sender: usenet@rpi.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Eaters of Wisdom
Lines: 13

In article <DEVEN.89Apr1184706@daniel.pawl.rpi.edu> deven@pawl.rpi.edu (Deven Corzine) writes:
>So, it actually got created!  Neat.  :-)

Yeah, but not for long, I bet.  The newgroup message was a fun forgery.
(I *knew* there was a reason I read 'control'.)  In fact, the first
rmgroup message has already arrived here.  So I'm going to post quick, before
it goes away.  I voted for c.p.t-i.e back when it was first proposed, and was
cheated out of my fair chance to use the group, so it's only fair.

When can we expect the alt.webber sub-hierarchy?

 In some sense, a stochastic process can do better; at least it has a chance.
S. M-J. C. Dominus 	entropy@pawl.rpi.EDU	     entropy@rpitsmts (BITnet)