Xref: utzoo comp.std.c:996 comp.lang.c:17370
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.uucp (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: realloc
Message-ID: <812@twwells.uucp>
Date: 2 Apr 89 19:51:06 GMT
References: <10170@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <10032@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <9974@megaron.arizona.edu> <9122@alice.UUCP> <9964@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Reply-To: bill@twwells.UUCP (T. William Wells)
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale
Lines: 16
Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:
Distribution:
Keywords:

In article <9964@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:
: Happens I'm the POC for 0-sized object extensions to C.  There has
: so far been a distinct lack of interest in this area..

Somehow I missed that. How would one have discovered it?  When I
submitted my comments on the standard, I did ask that there be zero
sized arrays at the end of structures; I got a NAK.

Could you clue me in on what existing proposals there are on zero
sized objects? Few may be interested, but I am.

---
Bill                            { uunet | novavax } !twwells!bill
(BTW, I'm may be looking for a new job sometime in the next few
months.  If you know of a good one where I can be based in South
Florida do send me e-mail.)