Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ulowell!cbmvax!jesup
From: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Byte Bites. (So have we read the Graphics section yet?)
Message-ID: <6485@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 3 Apr 89 23:07:57 GMT
References: <8904011630.AA21629@jade.berkeley.edu> <16620@cup.portal.com> <952@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu>
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup)
Distribution: na
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 22

In article <952@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> jwright@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu (Jim Wright) writes:
>In article <16620@cup.portal.com> Doug_B_Erdely@cup.portal.com writes:
>|  Enough talk... in my opinion we should hit Byte where it counts! I say
>| lets boycott anything connected with Byte, INCLUDING BIX!
>| 
>Nope.  Correct their mistakes.  Show them the benefits.  Provide them
>with articles.  And hit them where they really live - advertising.
>You'll never be able to "take over" the rag, but it's a good place to
>inform the public about what an Amiga really is.

	And don't boycott BIX.  The Amiga conferences _force_ them to 
notice the amiga exists and has a VERY good following among technically
oriented people - we're the biggest set of conferences on BIX.  If BIX
amiga use dwindles, they'll assume no one is interested in the Amiga.

	Plus BIX is announcing pretty good flat-rate policies.  Those of
us on BIX keep them on their toes, or at least try (some few of us can get
over-excited at times.)  Needless to say, the problems with the article have
been pointed out by a number of people to Fred Langa.

-- 
Randell Jesup, Commodore Engineering {uunet|rutgers|allegra}!cbmvax!jesup