Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!snll-arpagw!paolucci From: paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Yet Another Entry In The 1.4 Wish List... Message-ID: <90@snll-arpagw.UUCP> Date: 4 Apr 89 14:55:07 GMT References: <504@morgoth.UUCP> <3453@amiga.UUCP> <505@morgoth.UUCP> <716@ibmpa.UUCP> Reply-To: paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci) Organization: Sandia National Labs, Livermore, CA Lines: 23 In article griff@intelob.intel.com (Richard Griffith) writes: ->In article <716@ibmpa.UUCP> ericm@ibmpa.UUCP (Eric Murray) writes: ->>3. Dispense with gadgets completely, and use keyboard qualifiers in -> combination with mouse button clicks (i.e. to move a window to the -> front, hold the shift key & click the left mouse button on any -> available portion of the window). This is the system used by uwm -> under X. It's completely user configurable via a config file. -> It's easier to just find a corner of the window you want to -> resize or whatever and click on it while holding down a ket, than -> to slide the mouse pointer on to a small (on interlace) gadget. -> ->Wrong! (at least for me! :-) - I've used uwm under X, I don't like it ->nearly as well, I can manipulate several programs using one hand under ->the current system - It takes two using uwm/X Bleah! How `bout this ->instead? Make standard windows check for an interlace screen and ->change the size of the gadgets accordingly? This all depends on how you customize uwm. -- -+= SAM =+- "the best things in life are free" ARPA: paolucci@snll-arpagw.llnl.gov