Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!Doug_B_Erdely
From: Doug_B_Erdely@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Byte Bites. (So have we read the Graphics section yet?)
Message-ID: <16830@cup.portal.com>
Date: 8 Apr 89 01:12:25 GMT
References: <8904011630.AA21629@jade.berkeley.edu> <16620@cup.portal.com> <3720@amiga.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 29

In article <16620@cup.portal.com> Doug_B_Erdely@cup.portal.com writes:
) P-Link goes out of their way on the Amiga SIG. It
)is *THE* best place for Amiga. And it is about half the cost of BIX.
)
) Doug_B_Erdely@Portal.Cup.Com

1) BIX isn't the same as Byte.
2) You are wrong: bix is the best Amiga bbs, at least for developers.

You've posted this sentiment a couple of times.  Why?

	jimm
-- 
Jim Mackraz, I and I Computing	   	"Like you said when we crawled down
{cbmvax,well,oliveb}!amiga!jimm          from the trees: We're in transition."
							- Gang of Four

I posted my message ONCE! I am not sure how you got "a couple of times". Unless,
you count this message, then it would be twice! :>

WHY? Because I am tired of hearing people complain about Byte, yet doing 
NOTHING about it! And PLINK *IS* the best. At least for what most folks want.
And if the developers moved off of BIX then there would be no question at all.
And everyone has said that BIX is slow. Now granted, I will be the first to
admit, this is second hand info. But at the time I was asking about BIX, it
was more expensive than CompuServe.
          - Doug -

 Doug_B_Erdely@Portal.Cup.Com