Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!bbn!apple!well!ewhac
From: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: RastPort structure definition
Message-ID: <11317@well.UUCP>
Date: 14 Apr 89 05:42:49 GMT
References: <963@psueea.UUCP>
Reply-To: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Organization: (-: ACME Flamethrowers.  Mark Ethan Smith, CEO. :-)
Lines: 25
Quote: "But you'll have the chance to kill 50, maybe 60 people."

In article <963@psueea.UUCP> bartonr@psu-cs.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton) writes:
>From rastport.h :                      From rastport.i :
>
>struct RastPort                        STRUCTURE  RastPort,0
>{
> [ ... ]
>    BYTE    linpatcnt;                   BYTE     rp_Dummy
>    BYTE    dummy;                       BYTE     rp_linpatcnt
>
>  Note the reversal of linpatcnt and dummy.  Anyone know which is correct?

	When in doubt, believe the C .h file.  That's the rule I use,
anyway.

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ Old signature used to get past inews. _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
 ________		 ___			Leo L. Schwab
	   \		/___--__		The Guy in The Cape
  ___  ___ /\		    ---##\		well!ewhac@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
      /   X  \_____    |  __ _---))			..or..
     /   /_\--    -----+==____\ // \  _		pacbell -\
___ (   o---+------------------O/   \/ \	hoptoad --> !well!ewhac
     \     /		    ___ \_  (`o )	hplabs --/     ("AE-wack")
 ____ \___/			     \_/
	      Recumbent Bikes:			"Work FOR?  I don't work FOR
	    The _O_n_l_y Way To Fly!		anybody!  I'm just having fun."