Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ulowell!apollo!champine
From: champine@apollo.COM (Mark Champine)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: SR10.x vt100 emulator (Really vi bug)
Keywords: stinks worse than SR9's
Message-ID: <428cc1e9.c366@apollo.COM>
Date: 10 Apr 89 14:35:00 GMT
References: <976@lgnp1.LS.COM> <13015@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <994@sas.UUCP>
Reply-To: champine@apollo.COM (Mark Champine)
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 29

In article <994@sas.UUCP> sasmwk@sas.UUCP (Mark Kernodle) writes:
>
>	Amazingly, this vi bug (lines longer than current window width
>    cause vi to lose track of cursor position) exhibits itself in an
>    xterm window as well.  Perhaps it's Apollo's sucky vi, and not
>    the vt100 emulator or xterm.  
>
>	Does anyone there at Apollo have a workaround for vi in xterm?
>    

To fix xterm line wrap problems in vi, replace your xterm
termcap entry with the following:

vs|xterm|vs100|xterm terminal emulator (X window system):\
        :AL=\E[%dL:DC=\E[%dP:DL=\E[%dM:DO=\E[%dB:IC=\E[%d@:MT:UP=\E[%dA:\
        :al=\E[L:am:\
        :bs:cd=\E[J:ce=\E[K:cl=\E[H\E[2J:cm=\E[%i%d;%dH:co#80:\
        :cs=\E[%i%d;%dr:ct=\E[3k:\
        :dc=\E[P:dl=\E[M:do=^J:\
        :ei=\E[4l:ho=\E[H:im=\E[4h:is=\E[r\E[m\E[2J\E[H\E[?7h\E[?1;3;4;6l:\
        :k1=\EOP:k2=\EOQ:k3=\EOR:k4=\EOS:kb=^H:kd=\EOB:ke=\E[?1l\E>:\
        :kl=\EOD:kn#4:kr=\EOC:ks=\E[?1h\E=:ku=\EOA:\
        :le=^H:li#65:md=\E[1m:me=\E[m:mi:mr=\E[7m:ms:nd=\E[C:pt:\
        :rs=\E[r\E<\E[m\E[2J\E[H\E[?7h\E[?1;3;4;6l:\
        :se=\E[m:sf=\n:so=\E[7m:sr=\EM:\
        :te=\E[2J\E[?47l\E8:ti=\E7\E[?47h:\
        :ue=\E[m:up=\E[A:us=\E[4m:xn:
v2|xterms|vs100s|xterm terminal emulator (small)(X window system):\
        :co#80:li#24:tc=xterm: