Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pro-angmar.UUCP!m.tiernan From: m.tiernan@pro-angmar.UUCP (Michael Tiernan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Multitasking thought Message-ID: <8904111703.AA11699@obsolete.UUCP> Date: 11 Apr 89 14:18:56 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 34 A thought on this whole idea of a UNIX type operating system for the Apple IIs. First off, I'm going to state that which is obvious to some of you and absolutly forigen to some others of you. We all ready have a UNIX like operating system. Ok, not quite but from the point of the call interface it's close enough for our comparason. Yes, it's seriously lacking in memory management, job management, and other vital items. What I'm saying, is that we don't want to rebuild the OPERATING SYSTEM, ProDOS will do fine as a foundation. We don't need to do it so that it's incompatable. What most of the people here are looking for is a SHELL that will allow them to do the multitasking. I think that for the time being, unless we do get a Hertzfield for the gs, we're going to have to make some comprimises. The first one is that we may not get a system that can run all of our old software as we'd like it to. What we may have to do for to establish this kind of thing is create a C Shell type interface (Apple C Shell? ASH?) that uses new utilites, all written to adhere to the new rules. This is what Don Elton did for ECP. Before anyone puts me on the spit, I know this isn't great, but I think that some people may need to readjust their thinking on some of this. Please note, at no time did I say it's impossible! Let's face it, "Impossible" is the word that built a lot of companies.. Just by two bits worth. << MCT >> BCS Apple/Connection (617) 893-5681 [MCT] AppleLinkPE M Tiernan GEnie M.Tiernan obsolete!pro-angmar!m.tiernan@bloom-beacon.mit.edu obsolete!pro-angmar!m.tiernan@bu-it.bu.edu pro-angmar!m.tiernan@obsolete.uucp m.tiernan@pro-angmar.cts.com