Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!a360ad
From: a360ad@blake.acs.washington.edu (Gnurr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: TOS enhancements (Was: Re: Pexec Cookbook, and pseudolegal...)
Message-ID: <1500@blake.acs.washington.edu>
Date: 7 Apr 89 22:28:09 GMT
References: <1423@atari.UUCP> <1423@atari.UUCP> <1255@laura.UUCP> <1439@atari.UUCP> <56208@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>
Reply-To: a360ad@blake.acs.washington.edu (Gnurr)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 22

In article <56208@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> fischer-michael@CS.YALE.EDU (Michael Fischer) writes:
>In article <1439@atari.UUCP> kbad@atari.UUCP (Ken Badertscher) writes:
>>  Unfortunately, I can't discuss the OS changes that we're making until
>>they're releaseable.  Sorry!
>
>This seems like a bad policy for Atari to adopt.  How can you know
>what the community wants or what the implications of proposed OS
>changes might be if you don't discuss them before implementing them?
>==================================================

Now there's some logic for you...
But...
No one ever said 
Building computers
Was a democratic art...

Seems like Atari could benefit from the 
      countless wizards on the net....

I am not being fascist .... i mean, facetious...

-kevin