Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!pmjc
From: pmjc@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Pam Arnold)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Why unix doesn't catch on
Message-ID: <1483@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 11 Apr 89 22:07:44 GMT
References: <1922@dataio.Data-IO.COM> <101000047@hpcvlx.HP.COM> <199@isctsse.UUCP> <978@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu>
Reply-To: pmjc@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Pam Arnold)
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Rochester
Lines: 17

In article <978@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> jwright@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu (Jim Wright) writes:
>In article <199@isctsse.UUCP> pajerek@isctsse.UUCP (Donald Pajerek) writes:
>| Both the OS/2 and UNIX partisans believe that true multi-tasking
>| is such a compelling reason, but it's only recently that systems have
>| been available at a reasonable price that meet both conditions.
>
>...only recently that *INTEL* based systems...
[and so on]

Jim, note the name of this newsgroup. All of the great things that have
been done with Motorola processors are completely irrelevant to the IBM PC
community.

>Jim Wright


Pam Arnold