Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!gatech!emory!phssra From: phssra@mathcs.emory.edu (Scott R. Anderson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: "Sparc"intosh??? Keywords: Sun Microsystems, Sparc chips, infringement Message-ID: <3871@emory.mathcs.emory.edu> Date: 2 Apr 89 15:18:52 GMT References: <7461@thorin.cs.unc.edu> Reply-To: phssra@emory.UUCP (Scott Robert Anderson) Distribution: usa Organization: Department of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta Lines: 29 In article <7461@thorin.cs.unc.edu> markham@rho.cs.unc.edu (Andrew Markham) writes: >In one of my many computer publications (I think it was Byte), I saw an >article regarding a machine that was to be produced by Sun or HP or someone >that was supposed to blow the doors off any PC for essentially the same >price. I also heard the name was to be "Sparc"intosh. Now, I don't know if >it is me or not, but I don't think that Apple will let that name roll off of >the assembly lines. With a name involving "SPARC", you can be pretty sure they are talking about Sun Microsystems, since that is the name of the RISC chip they use. According to an article in the current MacWeek, they are planning to come out with two new lines of low-price workstations (~$5000) based on the 25 MHz 68030 and SPARC. I seriously doubt if they will be using the name "SPARCintosh"; the article said they will be named the Sun 3/80 and the SPARCstation 1, respectively. The former will be about 3 MIPS, the latter 12 MIPS. >I also read that the machine was not PC or Mac compatible(as if it could). >If so, how in the hell will it survive? I know that Amiga's are still alive, >but can anymore like that survive? It is a unix-based machine with a window system built on top. Believe me, it will have no problem surviving, whatsoever (Sun Microsystems is one of the fastest-growing computer companies around). * * ** Scott Robert Anderson gatech!emoryu1!phssra * * * ** phssra@unix.cc.emory.edu phssra@emoryu1.bitnet * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *