Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!accuvax.nwu.edu!tank!ncar!ames!lll-winken!uunet!mcvax!kth!draken!tut!santra!kampi!jmunkki From: jmunkki@kampi.hut.fi (Juri Munkki) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: NISUS wordprocessor Message-ID: <21081@santra.UUCP> Date: 6 Apr 89 08:29:06 GMT References: <882@tasis.utas.oz> <90377@felix.UUCP> Sender: news@santra.UUCP Reply-To: jmunkki@kampi.UUCP (Juri Munkki) Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland Lines: 36 In article <90377@felix.UUCP> kehr@felix.UUCP (Shirley Kehr) writes: >In article <882@tasis.utas.oz> ben@tasis.utas.oz (Ben Lian) writes: ><3.02? > > The reviews I've seen (here?) basically point out that it is superior for > manipulating words, especially doing search/replace. But Word is superior > for final layout of pages. For example, I beleive I read that NISUS does > not have headers and footers yet. Nisus does have headers and footers. Only two really important features seem to be missing: 1) Hyphenation. There's no way to soft hyphenate or even automatically hyphenate text. This might not be a problem with English text, but it certainly is with Finnish. 2) Footnotes. You might be able to do this with pictures, but it would be nicer to have real footnotes. I'd also like to have a grid when I'm drawing. The FullWrite grid is pretty awful, but at least I have some way of aligning my lines & boxes. In some ways Nisus is superior to both Word and FullWrite, but I guess FullWrite is better, if you have a Mac II & at least 2 MB RAM. I hope they get the bugs out of FullWrite. Nisus seems to be pretty stable, but it does have a few "features" (changing from inches to centimeters doesn't immediately update the rulers!) _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ | Juri Munkki jmunkki@hut.fi jmunkki@fingate.bitnet I Want Ne | | Helsinki University of Technology Computing Centre My Own XT | ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^