Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!mead.qal.berkeley.edu!lauac
From: lauac@mead.qal.berkeley.edu (Alexander Lau)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Confused about SIMMs
Message-ID: <23084@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 14 Apr 89 07:44:42 GMT
References: <195@xochitl.UUCP> <72@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu> <6760@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: na
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 14

In article <6760@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> mithomas@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Michael Thomas Niehaus) writes:
>To avoid confusion, I would say to only get SIMMs that are 120ns or faster.
>The slower ones may work now, but if you ever upgrade in the future...
>
>-Michael

The rumor is that the 25 MHz stuff that Apple is putting out "real
soon now" will require 100 ns chips, and the 33 MHz stuff will require
80 ns chips.  But, of course, that's only a rumor. :-)

--- Alex
UUCP: {att,backbones}!ucbvax!qal.berkeley.edu!lauac
INTERNET: lauac%qal.berkeley.edu@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
FIDONET: Alex.Lau@bmug.fidonet.org (1:161/444)