Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!apple!oracle!ehoward From: ehoward@oracle.uucp (Elliot Howard) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: NeXt Performance/Price Message-ID: <918@oracle.oracle.com> Date: 14 Apr 89 02:50:26 GMT References: <2648@tank.uchicago.edu> <56267@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> <16912@cup.portal.com> <16964@cup.portal.com> <3081@haven.umd.edu> <17032@cup.portal.com> <1989Apr12.230604.23347@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <43290@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <3323@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> Sender: news@oracle.com Reply-To: ehoward@oracle.UUCP (Elliot Howard) Distribution: usa Organization: Oracle Corporation, Belmont CA Lines: 20 In article <3323@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> anand@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Anand Iyengar) writes: >In article <43290@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> J Greely writes: >>>rm and ls make MORE sense than del and dir >>Not sure I'll buy that one. Any attempt to defend Unix command names >>on the grounds of "ease of use" is doomed from the start, unless > > Yuppers: Ref. unix dd and biff... > > Anand. >-- >"You're from Jersey? I'm from Jersey! What exit?" >{arpa | bit}net: anand@vax1.acs.udel.edu, iyengar@eniac.seas.upenn.edu >uucp:Same, just through uunet. Enough already! Arguing over the appropriateness of command names is silly on any machines that supports aliases. Personally, I use "dir" to get directory listings on my sun. And you can create as many links to the man page as you want. So why does it matter what the original command name is? Elliot Howard