Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!killer!rpp386!spdyne!root From: root@spdyne.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: Microport Buyout ( was: Micropo Message-ID: <1700021@spdyne> Date: 13 Apr 89 21:12:00 GMT References: <319@feedme.UUCP> Lines: 48 Nf-ID: #R:feedme.UUCP:319:spdyne:1700021:000:1949 Nf-From: spdyne.UUCP!root Apr 13 15:12:00 1989 In article <10317@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> tim@cit-vax.UUCP (Timothy L. Kay) writes: - -You aren't seriously considering a Microport buyout, are you? As has -been pointed out, they really don't have that much of value, and they -carry a pretty bad reputation. Eric@egsner writes: > Yes, Microport does have a fairly bad reputation right now. > But they also have name recognition. Starting an entirely new software > endevor, without a known name would be very expensive, just in terms of > getting the name established.. Fyi: Microport's Liabilities total $1,000,000. Total Assets total somewhere between $500,000 and $999,000. 64% of Uport's Capital Stock is owned by the officers, TeleVideo Owns 20%, 16% is owned by employees... Also, As for the connection between Televideo and Uport: "Intercompany relations consist of stock ownership in Microport Systems, Inc. There are no loans, guarantees, advances, endorsements or other intercompany relations." [As of 3/29/89 - Dunn & Bradstreet report.] They have/had 50 accounts. (Distributors/Computer manufacturers) They have a Branch Office in London, England. Employing 6 people as far as I can tell from the report. This office, or at least overseas market is about 25% of their sales. So you see, they have other assets that might be worth something.... However, I would think that 1M of debt would kill most of it's usefulness. On the other hand, One would think that you might be able to pick up the stock for a song right now.... If anyone wants the names or address of the Attorneys or name of the CE... I have them.. If One was truly interested in a buyout, it might be best to just buy up all the stock....It should be "worthless" if the company owes more than it has assets. [But then if it didn't, why would they be in Chap. 11?] -Chert Pellett chert@spdyne