Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!adm!xadmx!rbj@dsys.icst.nbs.gov
From: rbj@dsys.icst.nbs.gov (Root Boy Jim)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Future at Berzerkeley
Message-ID: <18943@adm.BRL.MIL>
Date: 4 Apr 89 16:01:13 GMT
Sender: news@adm.BRL.MIL
Lines: 18

? From: Doug Gwyn  <gwyn@smoke.brl.mil>
? Date: 29 Mar 89 17:07:04 GMT

? In article <3095@stpstn.UUCP> aad@stepstsone.com writes:
? -In article <4572@pt.cs.cmu.edu> jps@cat.cmu.edu (James Salsman) writes:
? ->a long time, but SysV will always be more stable.
? -Let's see:  svr1,svr2,svr3,svr3.2,svr4...  Seems like they come out with
? -versions a lot more often.

? He said "stable", not "stagnant".

I have to agree with Doug here. More releases == more bug fixes, and new
features in the field faster. The same is true with SunOS, and even VMS.

And hey, GNU emacs is up to version 18.53!

	Catman Rshd <rbj@nav.icst.nbs.gov>
	Author of "The Daemonic Versions"