Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!hsi!stpstn!aad
From: aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Decnet, VMS <==> Ultrix connection questions
Message-ID: <3109@stpstn.UUCP>
Date: 3 Apr 89 23:06:08 GMT
References: <88339@felix.UUCP> <115@crltrx.crl.dec.com> <3096@stpstn.UUCP> <4744@charon.unm.edu> <521@mmlai.UUCP>
Reply-To: aad@stepstone.com
Organization: The Stepstone Corporation, Sandy Hook, CT
Lines: 22

In article <521@mmlai.UUCP> burzio@mmlai.UUCP (Tony Burzio) writes:

>> >environment a whole lot better, and the CMU flavor is also cheap and does BSD
>> >lpr/lpd for remote printing.  Other vendors also supply TCP/IP for VMS.

>The CMU package does not work well to my Hewlett Packard.  For some reason it
>hangs up remote logins if they become inactive for a time.

HP-UX seems to have an auto-loggerout.  I think your problems there might
go away if you "unset autologout" in your shells, although I also admit there
might be a problem with the CMU tcp/ip itself.

>If you add NFS support to VMS along with RMS, do you need to have one of
>your symetrical procesors just running the I/O subsection?

There are those who don't want RMS anyway, but let's not start that again.

-- 
@disclaimer(Any concepts or opinions above are entirely mine, not those of my
	    employer, my GIGI, my VT05, or my 11/34)
beak is@>beak is not
Anthony A. Datri @SysAdmin(Stepstone Corporation) aad@stepstone.com stpstn!aad