Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!mtxinu!unisoft!hoptoad!peora!rtmvax!bilver!jwt!john
From: john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: /dev/fd
Message-ID: <257@jwt.UUCP>
Date: 12 Apr 89 18:57:54 GMT
References: <16817@mimsy.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples)
Organization: John W. Temples, III -- Orlando, FL
Lines: 11

In article <16817@mimsy.UUCP> chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>shuffle puts them back), then the ksh syntax
>
>	shuffle <(process1) <(process2)
>
>produces on standard output the combined output of the two processes,

I tried this (with diff, not shuffle) on two different kshs, and both barfed
on the syntax.  Is this only supported under certain versions of ksh or Unix?
-- 
John Temples - UUCP: {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd}!peora!rtmvax!bilver!jwt!john