Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!amdcad!sun!athena1!williamt
From: williamt@athena1.Sun.COM (William A. Turnbow)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: ESDI vs SCSI
Message-ID: <98994@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 14 Apr 89 01:51:20 GMT
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: williamt@sun.UUCP (William A. Turnbow)
Distribution: na
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 16

In article <18iMUeeCE3101061nHI@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> rickf@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Rick Francis) writes:
>for SCSI than for ESDI.  Of course it depends on how well the I/O
>load is distributed across the disks, and how well the driver is written.
>========================================================
										^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
										
>Rick Francis                        rickf@uts.amdahl.com

----

	Do you know of any good scsi drivers for the 386 that would be
usable for one of the Unix's?  At the time I was shopping around, there
were not even ANY SCSI drivers for microport or interactive (has this
changed now?).

-wat-