Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!rutgers!apple!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu!bob
From: bob@tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield)
Newsgroups: gnu.config,gnu.gcc
Subject: Re: GNU's not GNU...
Message-ID: <BOB.89Apr11104538@tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 11 Apr 89 14:45:38 GMT
References: <FAULKNER.89Apr10165918@jmullins.harvard.edu> <947@itivax.iti.org>
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Followup-To: gnu.config
Distribution: gnu
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept of Computer & Information Science
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: scs@vax3.iti.org's message of 11 Apr 89 14:23:51 GMT
Xref: utzoo gnu.config:17 gnu.gcc:382

In article <947@itivax.iti.org> scs@vax3.iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes:
   In article <FAULKNER.89Apr10165918@jmullins.harvard.edu> faulkner@jmullins.harvard.edu (Don Faulkner) writes:
   >Is it time for "gnu.d" or "gnu.politics"??

   Long past, actually.  Is there anyone 'officially' in charge of the
   gnu groups?  We could always start a 'creation/destruction'
   discussion :-) :-) :-)

Please move this discussion discussion to gnu.config.  It is
inappropriate for gnu.gcc/info-gcc.  I've directed followups
accordingly.