Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!purdue!gatech!mcnc!rti!xyzzy!bunter!muller
From: muller@bunter.dg.com (Woody Muller)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Cabal
Keywords: newgroup, vote, control
Message-ID: <4873@xyzzy.UUCP>
Date: 4 Apr 89 14:48:07 GMT
References: <3010@looking.UUCP> <63@norsat.UUCP> <288@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> <3031@looking.UUCP> <290@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> <291@ubbs-nh.MV.COM>
Sender: usenet@xyzzy.UUCP
Reply-To: muller@dg-rtp.dg.com (Woody Muller)
Organization: Data General Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Lines: 16

In article <291@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> noel@ubbs-nh.MV.COM (Noel Del More) writes:
>
>concerning the site administrators voting on the creation/deletion of
>newsgroups.
>
>While the details certainly need to be hacked out, it is in principle
>sound and fair to all.
>

Considering that some site administrators represent thousands, some represent
hundreds, some represent tens, and some represent a site of one user, How
do you come up with the conclusion that limiting USENET proceedings to
site administrators is "in principle sound and fair to all"?

--
                  "Standard disclaimers apply!"
      Woody Muller     919-248-5919(work)     919-544-6783(home)