Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!decvax!zinn!ubbs-nh!noel
From: noel@ubbs-nh.MV.COM (Noel Del More)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Cabal
Keywords: newgroup, vote, control
Message-ID: <309@ubbs-nh.MV.COM>
Date: 9 Apr 89 03:05:41 GMT
References: <3010@looking.UUCP> <63@norsat.UUCP> <288@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> <3031@looking.UUCP> <290@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> <291@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> <4873@xyzzy.UUCP>
Reply-To: noel@ubbs-nh.MV.COM (Noel Del More)
Organization: uBBS-NH  (New England Unix Archive)  - Nashua, NH
Lines: 23

In article <4873@xyzzy.UUCP> muller@dg-rtp.dg.com (Woody Muller) writes:
>Considering that some site administrators represent thousands, some represent
>hundreds, some represent tens, and some represent a site of one user, How
>do you come up with the conclusion that limiting USENET proceedings to
>site administrators is "in principle sound and fair to all"?

Would you argue then it is fairer to put your complete and absolute trust
in five people?

You are absolutely correct, however, which is why I proposed a two tier
voting scheme.  

The users vote, the site administrators vote.  

I never claimed to have the answers to usenet's "problem", if in deed one
even exists. 

Noel 

-- 
Noel B. Del More             |              {decvax|harvard}!zinn!ubbs-nh!noel
17 Meredith Drive            |                             noel@ubbs-nh.mv.com 
Nashua, New Hampshire  03063 | It's unix me son!  `taint spozed tah make cents