Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!unmvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!cbnewsl!sw
From: sw@cbnewsl.ATT.COM (Stuart Warmink)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: What if...
Message-ID: <387@cbnewsl.ATT.COM>
Date: 4 Apr 89 18:23:22 GMT
References: <18730@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <29106@sri-unix.SRI.COM> <7833@pyr.gatech.EDU>
Organization: Interface Systems at AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 15

In article <7833@pyr.gatech.EDU>, ccoprmd@pyr.gatech.EDU (Matthew T. DeLuca) writes:
> I don't have my thermogram handy (it's 40 miles away), so I can't supply 
> exact temperatures, but the OMS pods are fairly low-temperature areas of the
> Shuttle during re-entry. [...]

Why guess? Later flights have additional black tiles on the front of the 
OMS pods, so the temperature must have been higher than expected.

Matthew: I think this is as far as we should go without using e-mail...
         I've stated the facts, that is all I can do.  ;-)
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Captain, I see no reason to stand here  |  Stuart Warmink, Whippany, NJ, USA
 and be insulted" - Spock                | sw@cbnewsl.ATT.COM (att!cbnewsl!sw)
-------------------------> My opinions are just that <------------------------