Xref: utzoo news.groups:8771 misc.headlines:7693 sci.misc:3402 sci.physics:6871 sci.space.shuttle:2826 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc!iuvax!purdue!decwrl!decvax!cvman!gdelong From: gdelong@cvman.UUCP (Gary Delong) Newsgroups: news.groups,misc.headlines,sci.misc,sci.physics,sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: Fusion newgroup proposal Summary: please, not an alt.* group Message-ID: <546@cvman.UUCP> Date: 5 Apr 89 13:01:00 GMT References: <910@zorch.UU.NET> Organization: Computervision, Manchester, NH Lines: 45 In article <910@zorch.UU.NET>, scott@zorch.UU.NET (Scott Hazen Mueller) writes: [ First off, for the people who didn't see my original article: I am proposing [ creation of alt.fusion to carry discussions of the Utah cold-fusion experiment [ in one place. My apologies for the wide cross-posting; the groups mentioned [ are either concerned with newsgroup creation or are locations where fusion [ discussion is currently occurring. [ [ So far, the proposal has generated a small amount of favorable response, [ and an even smaller amount of unfavorable replies. To address the concerns [ of people who would like to see one place for fusion discussions but do not [ receive the alt.* heirarchy, I am announcing here my willingness to provide [ digests of the newsgroup for these people. [ [ For those who are wondering, "why an alt newsgroup", I feel that the [ experiment with alt.next indicated that a newsgroup can be created quickly [ in alt in response to a hot topic and then either aliased to a 'mainstream' [ group, ala comp.sys.next, or deleted if the topic dies down. [ -- [ Scott Hazen Mueller scott@zorch.UU.NET [ (408) 298-6213 (pyramid|tolerant|uunet)!zorch!scott Scott, I agree that the topic is important and deserves maximum exposure while the facts get shaken out of the rhetoric, but I don't think that this is a good idea. Many sites (including mine) do not carry the alt.* groups. The discussion of possible cold fusion is too important to be tucked away in the alt.* wastelands. (I couldn't even post a reply to the alt.config followup header) While I appreciate your offer to provide a digest of the discussion via e-mail, I already find myself gritting my teeth over just the normal USENET propogation delay. Please don't add an additional delay to that. There is a discussion going in sci.physics, which would seem to be a reasonable place. (If this is not a physics discussion, then I don't know what it would take to qualify as one.) Please. -- _____ / \ / Gary A. Delong, N1BIP "I am the NRA." gdelong@cvman.prime.com | \ / COMPUTERVISION Division {sun|linus}!cvbnet!gdelong \____\/ Prime Computer, Inc. (603) 622-1260 x 261