Xref: utzoo news.groups:8856 misc.headlines:7773 sci.misc:3465 sci.physics:7042 sci.space.shuttle:2853
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!watcgl!lily!cslewis
From: cslewis@lily.waterloo.edu (Cary Lewis)
Newsgroups: news.groups,misc.headlines,sci.misc,sci.physics,sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Fusion newgroup proposal
Keywords: New newsgroup, alt.fusion, sci.physics.fusion
Message-ID: <9162@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Date: 10 Apr 89 19:48:17 GMT
References: <910@zorch.UU.NET> <546@cvman.UUCP> <7877@pyr.gatech.EDU> <781@jack.UUCP> <4667@ihlpe.ATT.COM>
Sender: daemon@watcgl.waterloo.edu
Reply-To: cslewis@lily.waterloo.edu (Cary Lewis)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 19

In article <4667@ihlpe.ATT.COM> jho@ihlpe.ATT.COM (Yosi Hoshen) writes:
>
>I vote yes for sci.physics.fusion
>
>Yosi Hoshen

Based on the recent A&M annoucements, it sounds like ``cold fusion'' is real,
and therefore deserves a science newsgroup, perhaps alt.fusion could be used
for non-science (environmental, social impact, etc. ) issues as they relate 
to fusion, as opposed to the physical science underlying the phenomenon.

I hope that future replications of the experiment will reveal true nuclear
fusion occuring (as opposed to some chemical reaction), and I can't wait
to see all the media's reactions; after all this just might be the biggest
most important discovery since fire (too much of a cliche, eh? maybe we
can come with something better.)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cary Lewis - 4th year CS undergrad, Univ. of Waterloo