Xref: utzoo news.groups:8857 misc.headlines:7774 sci.misc:3466 sci.physics:7043 sci.space.shuttle:2854
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf.edu!kscott
From: kscott@cca.ucsf.edu (Kevin Scott)
Newsgroups: news.groups,misc.headlines,sci.misc,sci.physics,sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Fusion newgroup proposal
Keywords: New newsgroup, alt.fusion, sci.physics.fusion
Message-ID: <1820@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu>
Date: 10 Apr 89 19:33:57 GMT
References: <910@zorch.UU.NET> <546@cvman.UUCP> <7877@pyr.gatech.EDU> <781@jack.UUCP>
Reply-To: kscott@cca.ucsf.edu.UUCP (Kevin Scott)
Organization: Computer Center, UCSF
Lines: 35

In article <781@jack.UUCP> steve@jack.UUCP (Steven Harrison) writes:
> creation of alt.fusion to carry discussions of the Utah cold-fusion experiment
>I suggest an alternative name:  sci.physics.fusion
>>No mistaking the topic there!
>
>If there has not been a vote taken I think one should be called for.
>
>sci.physics.fusion sounds like a great place for the new nesgroup to be
>created.
>
>Any other responses to this suggestion???

A yes vote here.  Send votes here and I'll tally them while looking up
the procedure for moving a newsgroup.  It will be nice to get some mail,
I haven't received an alt.fusion mailing in many days.  When I do it will
probably be too large to boot.   So let us get a non-alt newsgroup and let
sci.physics return to normal.  

If you are a sci.physics person who wants to see sci.physics return to
normal, please feel free to vote even if you will never read sci.physics.fusion


Be it proposed,
in that alt.fusion does not have the ability to reach enough of the net,
in that alt.fusion has failed to clear sci.physics of the fusion topic.
and in that fusion is an issue of great importance that is not likely to die 
down too soon,
Let alt.physics be moved to sci.physics.fusion

________
mail votes to

kscott@cgl.ucsf.edu
kscott@cca.ucsf.edu
ucbvax!cgl!kscott