Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!ogccse!littlei!omepd!mipos3!mipos2!rajeevc
From: rajeevc@mipos2.intel.com (Rajeev Chandrasekhar~)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 68040 and 80486
Message-ID: <3891@mipos3.intel.com>
Date: 13 Apr 89 23:31:56 GMT
References: <1032@myrias.UUCP> <12289@reed.UUCP> <1049@myrias.UUCP> <1928@trantor.harris-atd.com>
Sender: news@mipos3.intel.com
Reply-To: rajeevc@mipos2.UUCP (Rajeev Chandrasekhar~)
Organization: Microprocessor Component Group, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 17

In article <1928@trantor.harris-atd.com> thaker@trantor.harris-atd.com (Gautam Thaker) writes:
>Why is comp.arch so quiet these days? What happened to the
>good old days of "processor wars"? 68040 and 486 have both
>been announced and there is almost nothing about them in
>the newsgroup. We have debated the question of which is
>better, the 386 or the 68030? Now can someone tell me which
>is better in the next round; the 68040 or the 486?
          
          definitely the 80486.. :-)


 rajeev

Rajeev Chandrasekhar
Intel Corp            >> theres someone in my head, and its not me << 
2625, Walsh Ave MS SC4-59                      (408) 765-4632
Santa Clara, CA 95051  {hplabs,oliveb}!intelca!mipos2!rajeevc