Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari!otc!softway!necisa!lynpac!croot
From: croot@lynpac.oz (Admin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: objective c
Message-ID: <299@lynpac.oz>
Date: 25 Apr 89 17:47:57 GMT
References: <4800061@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <6590099@hplsla.HP.COM>
Organization: Lynwood Pacific, Sydney, Australia
Lines: 15

In article <6590099@hplsla.HP.COM> jima@hplsla.HP.COM (Jim Adcock) writes:
> ...
>To me, C++ is object-oriented, and ObjC isn't.
> ...

From my understanding of Obj-C (from reading Brad Cox's "Object Oriented
Programming"), there is no reason you can't add the [] messages to C++,
getting Objective-C++. Then you have the best (and worst) of both worlds.
[p.s. IMHO Obj-C is more like Smalltalk so "objected-oriented" but that
      is by-the-by] ... cheers, matt.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"life? don't talk to me about life!"          Matt Atterbury. :-) :-( :-) :-(
"klaatu barada nikto"     Lynwood Pacific, Sydney, Australia. :-( :-) :-( :-)
matt@lynpac.oz.au (Europe/Internet) || uunet!munnari!lynpac.oz.au!matt (UUCP)