Path: utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!beh
From: beh@caen.engin.umich.edu (Bob Hruska)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: what is wrong with CBM?
Message-ID: <42ab6bca.1285f@maize.engin.umich.edu>
Date: 16 Apr 89 16:55:00 GMT
References: <551@corpane.UUCP>
Organization: U of M Engineering, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Lines: 22

From article <551@corpane.UUCP>, by sparks@corpane.UUCP (John Sparks):
> [complaints about 1084 monitor]
> 
> From what I was told at our local store, CBM realized the error of their 
> ways with the 1084, and fixed them by coming out with the 1084s. 
> The 1084s is supposed to have a much better picture, and not have the
> arcing problem.
> 
> Disclaimer: That's just what the local dealer told me. I use a Sony
> 1201CPD monitor, mucho nice!
> 
One thing I did notice about the 1084S is that it can't use NEARLY as many
rows/columns with MoreRows.  I have my workbench set up so that CLI's are
a full 80 columns and 25 lines, and I still have room to spare on my borders.
My roommates 1084S doesn't even quite fit my CLI on it.  Is this a sign of
the monitor being 'cheaper'?

-- 
Bob Hruska   University of Michigan Computer Aided Engineering Network (CAEN)

INTERNET: beh@caen.engin.umich.edu
    UUCP: {umix|ucbvax|uunet}!caen.engin.umich.edu!beh